There
are a lot of layers of genres that are not as clear at first. Many important
aspects that makes a genre a genre are almost neglected, such as exigence,
which allows the rhetor to get a certain reaction form the audience. Another example
would be the rhetor being aware of any constraints based on whom they are
speaking with. Furthermore, when considering visual literacy, the writer needs
to be sure that the visuals –photos, charts, or graphs - correlate with what
they are trying to prove.
A
prominent part of genre is that the audience is reacting the way the rhetoric
wants them to be reacting, if this process is happening successfully then that
means the audience agrees upon the genre. Genre generators are a very helpful
way of utterly understanding genres, because the websites demonstrate how
important it is to make a clear exigence, a reasonable discourse –if needed, having
knowledge of the existing constraints, and having a full understanding of the
rhetorical situation and context.
Scigen is a bit of joke, it helps
people get into some bogus science conferences, but this does help people
understand that exigence, which according to Laura Bolin Carroll “is the
circumstance or condition that invites a response.” If some even bogus
conferences are acceptation these reports they must be doing something right.
These reports are giving the reviewers what they want to here, by using
appropriate jargon. Also they know the way the structure of a science report is
suppose to look like and what kind of topics these “conferences” are looking
for. However, personally it seemed rather difficult to read through and even
difficult to follow, seeing that purpose of this genre generator is to create
nonsense articles for fake conferences it shouldn’t be easy to follow or even
interesting, so it makes sense. It helps people understand the way jargon and
looks, like the way this is structured
it is like it wants to be a satirical lab report.
The
Comic Strips were quite interesting and they could be a little hard to see the
genre, but they joke with genres. However, it does allow the reader to see the
chaos that comes from not having any constraints, the conversations would take
turns that didn’t even really make sense with the conversation because there
were no norms on what to say or do. Furthermore, there is a lack of exigence,
neither of the characters seems to be able to fully make their points clear to
the other, because both fail to analyze what the other is saying. This is seen
by the way they respond and how it doesn’t make very much sense. In a comical
way, these articles demonstrate how the failure of the audience understanding
what the rhetor is trying to say can cause the audience to give a reaction the
rhetor does not want, also showing a failure of topic, and rhetoric it woud be
a fail in genre.
The
comic also exemplifies how important it is to rhetorically analyze a situation,
because, for the most part, neither character was appropriately answering the
other. They were not analyzing what they were hearing, they were just speaking
about whatever they wanted to talk about or gave a response that seemed a
little too dramatic or extreme. This allows someone to understand that to fully
experience what the rhetoric is trying to say it is critical to analyze it
correctly, to have an appropriate response to it, most likely the response that
the rhetoric –based on its genre- is suppose to give the audience.
The
meme generator website really helps with understanding visual literacy. When it
comes to memes you want the picture to speak for the image, and match what the
caption says as well. For example, if it’s a picture of a doctor the caption
probably shouldn’t be a joke about Donald Trump. Another way it helps with
visual literacy is facial expressions, the person in the picture may look
sarcastic, like the old Willy Wonka meme, so the caption will also be
sarcastic. Memes also tend to be sarcastic and hopefully comical, they may also
follow a joke within pop culture, therefore memes do have conventions, that are
not always followed, but that are just common patterns. The genre of memes has
gained a lot of popularity because they are meant to be funny and for the most
part have been getting just that response.
Genre
generators allow people what it is about a genre that makes a genre, much
beyond just their conventions. They allow people to see the importance of
concepts such as audience and rhetor interaction, constraints of what can be
said in what context, and the exigence of the rhetor.
Gudino,
ReplyDeleteAhhhhh! Somehow, I forgot to upload your blog until just now (did I miss the link on the Google Doc? I’m not sure…. if so, bad Zack). In any event, I apologize that you haven’t received any feedback/comments on your blog until just now. ☹
On the positive side of life, it looks like you’ve got great taste in music. I’ll make sure to play some Sinatra this quarter as a way to partiallty off-set/compensate you for the blog upload blunder.
Re: PB1A, I like how you led me through your process of selecting it—both physically (your actions) and your thoughts. This is a major steps towards getting at the metacognitive reflection-type of thing that we’re shooting for in Writing 2. Fables are most definitely they’re own unique genre. As you’ve stated, moral lessons, animals, and simple vocabulary are some of the conventions that help “glue” this genre together.
Re: PB1B, woooooo! Look at Gudino’s shout-out to the scholars: “Scigen is a bit of joke, it helps people get into some bogus science conferences, but this does help people understand that exigence, which according to Laura Bolin Carroll “is the circumstance or condition that invites a response.”” Way to go, Gudino—this is an excellent way to connect the dots. I’ve written this on some other folks’ blogs, and I’d like to include it here too: with memes, the white capitalized font is outlined in black. Why would that be? Well, this way, the language can be displayed on any kind of background without getting drowned out. Also consider: what’s the content of pictures that are typically used? (Usually pop culture references, although some grainy “homemade” pictures are typically used too.) These are the sorts of angles and questions that I want us to develop an eye for.
Nice work here, Gudino. Your in-class participation is also awesome and much appreciated. Keep it up, sister. (And maybe try to work some visuals into your blog! It could make it a knock-out!)
Z
I really enjoyed reading your PB! I think you presented the information in a clear and concise way. I am glad that you included those first two paragraphs explaining the different aspects of writing that you were going to discuss later on in your PB. I liked reading about your take on the comic strip generator, and how you brought up the importance of rhetorically analyzing a situation in order to appropriately respond to it. You also made a good point about how the meme generator helps us understand the concept of visual literacy. Overall, I think you did a pretty solid job, keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete