Monday, October 12, 2015

Opinion Articles and the Veil Debate

Amy Gudino
De Piero
Writing 2
9 October 2015
Muslim Women and their Choice of Headdress
            One of the most controversial topics of today—that is constantly being debated and discussed—is the issue of Muslim women wearing headdresses, and whether this is a matter of oppression or choice based on personal beliefs. Although there are some Muslim countries that do force women to wear headdresses, most Muslim women chose to wear a headdress, because this is how they feel they are being a devoted Muslim woman and simply because it is a part of their culture. A plethora of knowledge of this topic comes from the media, which many times can be easily manipulated or corrupted, however opinion articles can help greatly to see different opinions and point of views of the topic. Although opinion articles are not based on fact it allows readers to get a real sense of the differing opinions around a topic.
           
        
Veil illustration by Noma Bar            The easiest and most obvious convention to make about opinion articles is that they are very opinionated, as they should be, but there is something more to saying something is opinionated. It is more than just sharing opinions it is the way in which they are shared. All three of the opinion pieces I have read—although stating different opinions—had a very critical tone toward their opposite views and a confident tone toward their own views. They do this because they want people to really believe what they are saying. In one of the articles called “As a Muslim woman, I see the veil as a rejection of Progressive views” by Yasmin Alibhani Brown she discusses the way in which she feels the veil “oppresses women” (Brown). In contrast, The Telegraph writer Radhika Sanghani in her article “Feminism, Fashion, and Religion: Why Muslim Women chose to wear the veil,” she explains how the ban of veils to her and many students who went to the same school as a girl who was told she could not wear her veil, the restriction was “Islamaphobia” (Sanghani). In the case of Shelina Zahra Janmohamed, in her article “Calling all Feminist: Get over the veil debate, focus on real problems,” being that her audience are feminist she says to them, “Feminists: stop fighting over what I wear, and start addressing who I am. I am neither burqa nor bikini. I am woman,” to try to prove her point (Janmohamed).
            Because opinion pieces are suppose to explain why that person feels the way they do, they use persuasive tools to explain these feelings, such as ethos, pathos, and logos. When writing for opinion pieces, the writers of the piece use ethos to demonstrate why they have the right to the opinion they obtain, and why their qualifications make their points valid. In these cases, all three were Muslim women who are expected to wear some kind of veil. Because they know the culture and have the experiences they feel that this adds entitlement to their opinion. When using logos in opinion pieces all three of the women attempted to explain how logical their opinion was. Alibhai-Brown wants people to see that convincing women to wear veils through religion is unfair, and therefore is a form of oppression because they feel forced to do so. However Sanghani, sees it differently and even had other women to explain their reasons to show people that women even have different reasons that were not religion to wear their veils, which opposes the argument of Alibhai-Brown and many that they are brainwashed to wearing veils via their religion. To continue with the same idea, Janmohamed also brought up this issue, raising the question “If Muslim women are brainwashed into veiling, then is the mini-skirt generation equally brainwashed into believing that showing skin is liberation?” (Janmohamed). This question calls attention because she addresses the issue whether if it is society that actually controls people’s decision in every culture. If that’s what people think the case is for her culture then maybe that is the case for all of them. The three articles use statements that show the logic of each of their points.
            All of these women are directing their opinion pieces to a feminist audience, so they know what angle to take when it comes to the pathos of persuasion. In the first one she discusses the oppression of women and the way veiling is a mechanism to do so, for feminist anything used to oppress women is the enemy, knowing her audience Alibhai-Brown stresses this point so that women can feel compassion for Muslim women. Sanghani uses pathos to grab the attention of the reader at the very beginning of her article telling the aggravating story of a young girl in the UK who was prohibited to wear her veil to school and how her colleagues stood behind her in her fight against her beliefs and the school, a touching story that leaves the audience thinking not about Muslim women and the way their religion “requires” them to wear a veil but about religious freedom which of course for many feminist is a very prominent issue. Lastly, Janmohamed takes a different approach and takes other women who are feminist and explains their reasons of why they wear their veils some even admitting that it is because they are told to do so by their religion, but by using real women it is likely to grab a feminists attention, because she is trying to prove it is a choice. If Muslim feminists are saying it is their choice then it may get through to other feminists because all feminist want to be able to make all their own choices. Furthermore, her article’s theme is about feminists uniting and addressing issues more important than Muslim women wearing veils. The article is a plea to stop feminist from worrying about the veil, because it is a personal choice, and to worry about topics that are worthy of feminists’ attention. Ethos, pathos, and logos are very critical component of opinion articles because it attempts to make the opinions of the writers valid and logical, this is a very essential element to the genre because they use these according to the audience they are attempting to convince. Considering audience is so crucial to genres because they are the one that really deem what a piece of writing is.
            Opinion articles are meant to entail a new point of view or perspective, therefore they need to have exigence because they want to be heard by the right audience. Opinion pieces want to be thought about and considered, to hopefully install a change of mindset of someone or at least have that person consider their point. These women want people to believe that veils are—in one case the reason for oppression and for the other two a choice Muslim women make on their own. For these women, they feel the need to tell feminists because they know that they will be the ones that will care the most and may take initiative to make the change, they are speaking with a group they are already a part of and can relate to. They also reassured that although clearly on one side they never disrespected the other side and kept a professional but direct tone. All three women are attempting to make this the next most important topic on the feminist agenda therefore their exigence is aimed in the right direction.
            Opinion articles are quite common to see, especially in college where students have to write countless research papers, so it is crucial to know that first, they are reading an opinion article. Secondly, it is important to know what affect the opinion article is suppose to have on its audience, what it is trying to prove and how effectively the article showing their perspective. Furthermore, opinion articles are meant to persuade its audience’s initial opinions if it differs of the author’s. If this is the case, the reader must pay close attention to the tactics and if there are reasons that the reader actually agrees with it or not, and if it is or is not something they agree with and why or why not. This is especially crucial for writing a college paper because the opinion article should be used appropriately to help prove the thesis.
            Furthermore, opinion articles are just beneficial to be able to form thoughts and opinions to know what to say or defend it or to obtain knowledge of a topic. Even if the reader and writer have differing opinions it is critical to understand both sides just to have grounds to speak upon a topic without being unjust but knowledge and respectful. Opinion articles are also helpful to show an opinion for larger group, so it gives the reader the opportunity to enter the mind of that particular mindset, again giving them a better sense of the world around them. To know that an article is that of an opinion they will know that they have no obligation to feel the same way but to simply know how the other side thinks and feels of the same topic. Opinion articles helps readers form their own opinions and a basis to defend that position and explain why they feel that way about their opinion.





















Works Cited
Alibhai-Brown, Yasmin. "As a Muslim Woman, I See the Veil as a Rejection of Progressive Values." The Guardian. Guardian News and Media, n.d. Web.

Sanghani, Radhika. "Feminism, Fashion and Religion: Why Muslim Women Choose to Wear the Veil." The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group, n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2015.

Janmohamed, Shelina Zahra. "Calling All Feminists: Get over the Veil Debate, Focus on Real Problems." Al Jazeera English. Aljazeera, n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2015.



No comments:

Post a Comment